Why Should You Care About the Durbin Amendment?

Average: 4.4 (10 votes)

The Great Interchange Debate

Credit unions and community banks all across America are warning the public about an amendment (called “the Durbin amendment”) to the Financial Reform Bill currently being pushed through Congress. This amendment would shift the burden of paying what are called “interchange fees,” the payments that support the administrative and anti-fraud expenses, from the retail merchants who accept a debit card to the financial institutions that issues them.

When a person uses a debit card, the retail merchant is guaranteed payment. In exchange for that guarantee, that retailer pays a fee called “interchange,” which is a couple pennies for every dollar transacted.

Use of a debit card essentially provides the retailer with protection that they do not receive when accepting a check, because if the check bounces, the responsibility is on the merchant to collect. But, if a debit card transaction goes bad, the financial institution issuing that card must cover the transaction amount.

Here’s a chart that outlines the responsibilities of card issuers and retail merchants and the key benefits that debit cards (supported by interchange fees) provide:

Vantage Credit Union Merchant
Responsibilities

  • 100% of card issuing expense
  • 100% of card operating expense
  • 100% of fraud losses
  • Statement & Call Center services
 Responsibilities

  • From less than 1% up to 2% interchange fee
 Benefits (to members)

  • A safe, easy way to pay for goods & services
  • Worldwide & universal acceptance
 Benefits

  • Immediate & guaranteed payment
  • Consumer convenience & safety
  • Increase in goods & services purchased
  • Lower costs handling checks, currency and losses

What’s interesting is we seem to have an amendment that is feeding on consumer anger that all financial institutions are bad and have hidden profit motives. Credit unions aren’t part of Wall Street. We are NOT a “greedy profit driven” financial institution. But, most importantly, interchange rates have absolutely nothing to do with the financial crisis and are completely out of scope of this Financial Reform Bill. But, don’t believe me. I’m biased right? I work here. So, let’s look at a couple interesting and unbiased groups who oppose the Durbin Amendment.

Most interesting opposition: State treasurers from 47 states (including Missouri and Illinois) oppose the Durbin amendment. Let me repeat that again. Virtually every State Treasurer in the United States opposes the Durbin amendment. Why? One reason, according to Shane Osborn, Nebraska’s State Treasurer, “The Durbin amendment would undermine federal and state efforts to provide financial products to millions of low-income Americans, and could shift the cost of card usage to those who can least afford it.”

Another interesting finding: a report from the non-partisan Government Accountability Office last November did not find any need for interchange to be regulated in the United States. It cited both sides of the argument in a factual way, but also cited how Australia’s decision to regulate interchange several years ago has not yielded the promised consumer benefits touted by retailers who supported the legislation. Why repeat the mistake made in another country?

One might think the opposition to Senator Durbin’s amendment is comprised mostly of Visa, MasterCard and financial institutions. But, even celebrities like Russell Simmons oppose the Durbin amendment (Russell's letter to Senator Durbin was published in the Huffington Post) as do small business groups like the National Black Chamber of Commerce and the Latino Coalition.

Vantage Credit Union supports strong consumer protection practices and is committed to advocating pro-consumer legislation. However, we do not support the last-minute amendment from Senator Durbin to the Financial Reform Bill because it will have unintended consequences for any consumer using a debit card, including:

  • If retailers are successful in shifting their fair share of debit card payment costs, as reported in the New York Times on May 21, 2010, consumers will likely need to pay more for checking account services. Even a 50% shift in costs from government intervention would mean consumers could face new debit card fees of approximately $25 per year.
     
  • Consumers will lose their freedom of choice at the checkout because retailers would be able to dictate how they pay. Merchants could charge higher prices based on card type, as well as set minimum/maximum purchase requirements. They could even choose whether or not they would accept certain types of cards (i.e. pre-paid, debit, credit) and which issuing financial institution card they would (or would not) accept.
     
  • Nowhere in Durbin’s amendment does it mention the requirement for retailers to lower prices based on the cost savings they would experience if this bill is enacted into law. Why should Congress intervene to boost profits of big-box retailers when it seems certain consumers will ultimately pay for it?
     
  • The Durbin amendment “exempts” financial institutions under $10 billion in assets. However, no one can explain how it’s practically possible to accomplish this. In reality, if the Durbin amendment passes in its current form and Vantage Credit Union wants to continue offering card services to its members, we will have to play by the same rules/fee structure as the big banks and big card issuers.

As a member-owned financial cooperative, it’s critical that you understand pending legislation that could impact you. In its current form, the Financial Reform Bill with the Durbin amendment is harmful to you as a consumer. Therefore, we urge you to contact your US House Representative and US Senator immediately to voice your opposition. Visit www.capwiz.com/cuna to contact your representative today!

On a more lighthearted note, here’s a YouTube video we found about opposing the Durbin amendment:

Comments

I'm still shocked that Eric would stand with the big banks on this one. How quickly you fell for their garbage! Adam J. Levitian, an associate professor of law at Georgetown University says that the Durbin proposal is aimed at the fees merchants pay but will untimately benefit consumers.
NOT SURPRISINGLY, with 48 billion at stake, banks don't seem to care too much about social fairness.

From Daily Finance:

http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/the-debate-over-swipe-fees-should-the-...

@Dianna,
Thank you for commenting to my post. The Financial Reform Bill does have some provisions that ultimately benefit/protect consumers by implementing some much needed controls on Wall Street that will reduce the probability of future financial crises. However, the Durbin Amendment is a completely separate matter.

As you point out, the Durbin Amendment would allow the Federal Reserve to set one pricing tier for debit card issuers based on the “reasonable and proportionate” approach. But, what exactly is “reasonable and proportionate?” No one has defined this. What’s considered “reasonable and proportionate” for one debit card issuer is NOT reasonable and proportionate for another. So, although the cost to the issuer (Vantage Credit Union) for each debit card transaction is the same regardless of transaction amount, our cost of providing debit card services to our members is VERY DIFFERENT than the cost for a large debit card issuer. Small financial institutions, like Vantage, are strongly opposed to the Durbin Amendment because (among other things) it will significantly raise our costs for providing debit card services to our members. But, there are other drawbacks of the Durbin Amendment as well.

I am not seeing how it benefits consumers to allow individual merchants to set minimum or maximum transaction amounts on debit cards at the point of sale. Many people don’t carry a lot of cash with them and enjoy the convenience that debit cards provide. If the Durbin Amendment passes, consumers would lose the convenience of using their debit card for certain transactions. How are consumers going to remember all the different transaction requirements imposed by the merchants? Will customers become annoyed with this new requirement and take their business elsewhere, or will they accept these new payment conditions and shrug if off as the “new reality?” I don’t have the answer, but I simply do not see any benefit to consumers for transaction minimums and maximums. It eliminates freedom of choice.

Here’s another point you won’t see mentioned in most articles about the Durbin Amendment subject: nowhere in the amendment does it require merchants to lower their pricing for consumers as a result of all the cost savings merchants will realize from this Bill. I mean, if the Bill’s primary “public-facing benefit” is that it will save consumers money on goods/services purchased with a debit card, then let’s get serious and mandate the merchants pass-through some of their vast transactional savings into the Bill. That’s only “socially fair,” right?

I am very skeptical the merchants will pass on their savings to consumers if the Durbin Amendment passes. One only needs to look to Australia as an example to see there is no clear evidence that regulating interchange yields better consumer pricing. If this Bill passes with the Durbin Amendment in tact, merchants will have two choices: lower their consumer pricing and be more competitive (only if necessary), or enjoy a higher profit margin until competitive forces dictate otherwise. I'm not a betting man, but I suspect I might successfully predict how this one will play out.

Neither Vantage Credit Union, nor I, am “standing with the big banks” on this issue. We are simply opposed to the amendment because it reduces consumer payment choice, significantly increases our operating costs and provides no methodology for the Federal Reserve to define what is “reasonable and proportionate." I appreciate your comment and hope I have provided more information to better define the rationale for our position.

Post new comment

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of comments and ideas among the Vantage community. It's this exchange of ideas and views that helps us learn how better to serve our members. But, keep things family-friendly. Comments should be respectful, on-topic and free from profanity. Have a question? Please read our comment guidelines for further details. The comments and opinions posted by our bloggers are solely theirs and not necessarily supported or endorsed by Vantage.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
The following question is intended to prevent automated spam submissions and ensure you’re a live visitor.
Syndicate content

VantageCU Twitter Feed

  • RT @YoungFreeSTL If you're signed up for our monthly drawings, make sure you put youngfreestlouis@gmail.com on your SAFELIST! You might... 18 min 4 sec ago
  • New vcu.com post: Not Your Mama's Account Online Tour - Although I may not be Young & Free, I recently enro... http://ht.ly/18V93M 1 day 22 hours ago
  • If you haven't checked out @YoungFreeSTL, take a quick minute for Tailgating on the Cheap! http://ow.ly/2B8Yj Awesome video, Rob! 2 days 2 hours ago
  • Why “Zero Percent” Will Still Cost You Money: http://ht.ly/2B49B 2 days 4 hours ago
  • Opened a Not Your Mama's Account lately? Make sure you enroll your account online to reap all its benefits! http://ow.ly/2yMtF @YoungFreeSTL 1 week 19 hours ago

test